Contributed by Zeke Iddon
The Olympic Winter Games is nearly upon us, and the press machine has already
been in full-force during the run up… but sadly, not in an altogether positive
way.
The furore caused by the denigration of gay athletes and visitors by Sochi’s
mayor (and the wider administration) is, as many have been quick to rightly
criticize, counter to the spirit of diversity that any Olympic event should be
all about. And really, it would be all to easy to point out that the anti-gay
propaganda defies the very origins of
the Games given that it began with buck-naked, muscular Grecians getting oiled
up and wrestling with each other.
But since the silliness has now been busted wide open, hopefully this will mark
a turning point for Russia. Either way, there’s currently not much more to say
on the issue that hasn’t already been said, so let’s get on to another
important topic that hasn’t received quite as many column inches: sustainability
at the Sochi Games.
Going Green in a Land of White
Long before Sochi totally forgot what the word ‘budget’ meant (having overrun
the original $12Bn budget to become the most expensive Olympics ever at $51Bn),
the organizing committee made some heady claims about becoming the first ever
carbon-neutral Games event. Sochi was not the first to pledge this aim;
Vancouver (with its 2010 Winter Games) and London (at the 2012 Summer Olympics)
also shot for total carbon-neutrality, but ultimately ended up falling short.
So is Sochi on track to achieve this goal?
It’s a tough call to make at this stage, but the prognosis is looking precarious.
Numerous impressive green initiatives were announced shortly after the bid was
awarded, and for the most part, these have been delivered upon; five saplings
have been planted for every one tree felled, fishing populations have been
replenished, eco-friendly sewage treatment and energy plants have been
constructed, and further measures have been put in place to offset the carbon
footprint caused by mass travel to the games.
The various initiatives have been instrumental in both improving economic
prosperity to the region as well as offsetting the 160,000 tons of carbon
dioxide expected to come as an indirect result of the games. In addition, the
official Olympic partner for the games – Dow Chemical – is pledging direct
construction offset measures as part of its “Sustainable Future” program. These
are predominantly in the form of implementing low-carbon technology to help
improve green industry and architecture across Russia.
Naturally, Dow Chemical has its own operating footprint to offset, which it
plans to do by siphoning off methane gas from landfills (in Georgia) to power
nearby plants. While generating power from disposed waste is not a new scheme –
for instance, the Poly2Petro
process can turn the kind of plastics discarded after an Olympic event into
readily usable fuel – the scheme is one which is expected to offset the lion’s
share of Sochi’s carbon footprint.
Of the initiatives, Sochi Organizing Committee
president Dmitry Chernyschenko has stated: “One of our main inspirations is to
take a significant step forward to help increase environmental awareness and
inspire others to do the same in Russia.”
At surface level, this all sounds like good news but many commenters have
expressed a lot of justifiable doubts as to whether it’ll all pay off in the
end.
One Step Forward, Two Steps Back?
Numerous scientists and climate change experts were dismayed at Sochi’s bid to
conduct mass construction efforts near the Caucasus Biosphere Reserve (a
protected UNESCO heritage site), but plans went ahead regardless with seemingly
disastrous results.
While it’s all well and good to use efficient landfill schemes to successfully
offset the carbon dioxide generated from millions of people congregating in one
place, this achievement is marred when an entirely new landfill is created in a
protected water zone.
And that is exactly what is happening here: according to reports trickling down from the Associated Press, Russia’s government-controlled
train monopoly has been dumping waste from its construction efforts en masse
into the Mzymta River Valley.
Around 5,000 acres of forest have already been lost, which is already enough to
irreparably alter the ecosystem of the national park. Russia’s blanket response
to any protests raised is that ‘dumping has ceased’, despite no evidence to
back this up.
It’s Not What You Know…
This raises the question as to whether there is more going on behind the scenes
that we’re not aware of. More worrying still is that we may never know the full story, given that
speculation about authorities silencing activism efforts are running rife.
It seems we’ll have to wait and see whether or not everything will balance out.
In this regard, the eco-standing of the Sochi Winter Games is comparable to the
mixed-messages it is putting out on the whole gay issue: everything is going
ahead as planned, and everybody here is happy and on the same page…
… just pay no attention to the man behind the iron curtain.
.jpg){kind=logo}
